Member News

Despite billions being spent on corporate learning every year, many organisations still struggle to improve real-world performance in a measurable way. This is particularly true when it comes to developing practical skills like sales, negotiation, leadership conversations, or conflict management.

Let’s take a simple example. Imagine a company wants to improve the negotiation ability of its sales team. Traditionally, there are two routes.

The First Approach: E-Learning

E-learning has become the most common and cost-effective option. Its biggest strength is access to information. Within a relatively short period of time, someone can learn almost everything there is to know about negotiation theory:

• The psychology behind decision making
• Common negotiation frameworks
• Techniques for handling objections
• Methods for structuring deals

Modern platforms can also test knowledge through quizzes and assessments, ensuring people have understood the material. From a cost and scalability perspective, it’s hard to beat, but there is a major drawback. Humans do not learn complex skills particularly well through passive consumption of information. 

Reading about negotiation and actually negotiating are very different things. Most people know this intuitively. It's one of the main reasons we send our children to school rather than simply giving them textbooks and videos at home. Interaction matters. Practice matters. Without it, the transfer from theory to real-world performance is often minimal.

The Second Approach: Human-Led Training

At the other end of the spectrum are in-person development programmes, workshops, and coaching. When designed and delivered well, these interventions can be extremely effective. They allow participants to:

• Practice skills
• Receive feedback
• Learn through interaction

However, they come with two significant challenges. The first is cost. High-quality training programmes and coaching interventions can be expensive and difficult to scale. The second is consistency and reinforcement. Too often, these programmes become single events. A workshop is delivered, people leave motivated, but there is limited follow-up and little opportunity for repeated practice. Companies effectively hope that employees will remember what they learned and embed it in their daily work.

But we know learning doesn’t work like that.

We don’t expect children to remember everything from one lesson at school. Real learning happens through repetition, practice and reinforcement over time.

The Emerging Third Option: AI Simulations

This is where AI simulations may fundamentally change how companies train their people. Voice-based, interactive AI simulations allow employees to practice real conversations in realistic scenarios. Instead of simply learning about negotiation techniques, a salesperson can practice negotiating with an AI counterpart that:

• Pushes back on pricing
• Raises objections
• Changes the dynamics of the conversation
• Responds differently each time

The employee is actively engaged in the interaction, not just consuming information. In many ways, AI simulations combine the best elements of both traditional approaches. Like e-learning, they are scalable and cost-effective; like coaching or workshops, they are interactive and practice-based.

In fact, they may go even further. Because the simulations provide a safe space to practice, employees can experiment, make mistakes, and refine their approach without the pressure of real commercial consequences. They can practice repeatedly, building confidence and capability over time.

A potential industry shift is coming!

The global e-learning market alone is expected to reach $800 billion by 2030. but will the industry look the same by then? If AI simulations continue to develop at their current pace, corporate training may look very different within a few years.

Rather than simply consuming information or attending occasional workshops, employees could be practicing real workplace scenarios every week through AI-driven simulations. The result could be learning that is:

• more measurable
• more practical
• developing more learnt behaviour
• and ultimately more effective.

So the question may not be whether AI simulations will play a role in corporate training.The real question might be: Will they quietly improve existing approaches… or completely reshape the industry?