Guest Articles

The Sunday Times put a precise number on it: approximately £1.4 billion. The assets acquired include The Ivy Brasseries, Scott’s, Sexy Fish, Noema, and the Birley Clubs, which encompass Annabel’s, George, Harry’s Bar and Mark’s Club. These venues sit at the apex of British social and dining life, carrying decades of cultural weight and a membership clientele that is, by design, difficult to impress.

Understanding why Abu Dhabi bought them requires understanding what Abu Dhabi is building, and what it already knows about the clientele it serves at home.

DIAFA has moved at a pace that most hospitality holding companies would consider aggressive. In September 2025, it took a majority stake in the h.wood Group, the Los Angeles operator behind Delilah, The Nice Guy and Poppy, pushing that brand’s valuation into nine-figure territory. A month later, it acquired a 49 percent interest in Azumi, the London-based group that owns Zuma and Roka, two of the most globally recognised luxury dining concepts of the past two decades. The Caring portfolio is the third major acquisition in under seven months.

That sequence looks faster than it almost certainly was. Deals of this kind, particularly those involving legacy brands with complex ownership structures, long-standing founder relationships and deeply embedded cultural identity, do not emerge from a standing start. The conversations behind the h.wood investment, the Azumi stake and the Caring acquisition were in all probability years in the making, with relationships cultivated, terms explored and trust built gradually over time in the way that only patient capital with a genuinely long investment horizon can afford to do.

What the public timeline shows is a series of announcements. What it does not reveal is the prior years of positioning, relationship management and strategic preparation that made those announcements possible.

Sovereign-backed platforms acquire irreplaceable assets by waiting until the conditions, the relationships and the moment align, and then moving with what appears, from the outside, to be sudden and decisive speed.

Each transaction has added a distinct piece of a deliberate architecture, spanning international casual dining, premium social dining, celebrity nightlife and private membership. The portfolio now covers the full spectrum of how a high-net-worth individual chooses to spend an evening, a weekend or a membership year, and the strategic coherence across those acquisitions is evident.

The appointment of Ravi Thakran as Group CEO reinforces the same reading. Thakran was Group Chairman of LVMH Asia and founded L Capital Asia, overseeing more than four billion dollars in investments across 32 companies. He understands how to extend established luxury brands across new markets without diluting what made them desirable in the first place, and the LVMH parallel is instructive: this is a conglomerate model being applied to experiential hospitality, and Thakran has spent a career executing exactly that playbook.

Richard Caring will remain as Executive Chairman, a structuring decision that reflects what was negotiated and what was protected. Caring built his business on atmosphere, discretion and the loyalty of a clientele whose trust, once lost, is rarely recovered. The names above the doors carry meaning because they have been carefully protected for decades, and the presence of their founder in an ongoing leadership role is the clearest signal that the new owners understand this.

The acquisition logic rewards closer examination, because a deal at this scale and with this degree of brand specificity reflects a deliberate thesis rather than opportunistic capital seeking prestigious addresses.

The first pillar is heritage. DIAFA is acquiring institutions rather than concepts, and the distinction carries commercial weight. The Ivy, Annabel’s, Scott’s and Harry’s Bar have accumulated decades of social sediment, carrying associations, rituals and clientele loyalties that take generations to build and cannot be replicated through investment alone. Zuma and Roka, acquired through Azumi, were exceptional concepts constructed from scratch. The Birley Clubs and Caprice Holdings represent a fundamentally different category of asset: venues woven into the social fabric of a city, and Gulf sovereign capital, operating on the kind of time horizons that most commercial investors find uncomfortable, is well positioned to recognise and value that difference.

"Cultural capital is the primary asset. The real estate is the address at which it happens to reside."

The second pillar is the control of cultural capital. Annabel’s functions as access, network and social identity for a specific tier of global society. Its members include heads of state, senior executives and families whose names appear on the donor boards of the institutions they fund.

The waiting list, the social selection process, the physical environment and the accumulated history of the club are inseparable from its value, and a platform that controls social infrastructure of this kind holds something that balance sheets find genuinely difficult to fully capture.

The third pillar is the bridge between London and the Gulf. The clientele of Annabel’s, Scott’s and Harry’s Bar is international, and a meaningful portion of it has significant presence in the GCC. DIAFA gains structural access to a global social network that already carries deep connections to the region’s wealthiest residents and visitors, and the cross-flow of clientele, capital and cultural influence between these two worlds is something the platform is now positioned to shape rather than simply observe.

The announced restaurant rollouts are the most visible layer of this deal. The more significant value creation will unfold across a broader canvas, and the sequence is relatively legible to anyone who has watched how Gulf-backed platforms generate returns from hospitality assets over time.

Hotels are most likely the natural next step. DIAFA currently operates across dining and nightlife, and the move into branded hotel or resort product, whether through direct development, management contracts or partnership with existing operators, would give the platform a full-spectrum luxury lifestyle offer that its brand portfolio now supports convincingly. The wider market has already demonstrated the appetite for precisely this kind of extension.

The transformation of luxury brands into hospitality and residential products is one of the defining commercial stories of the past decade: Bulgari, Armani, Aman and Porsche Design are among a growing number of brands whose primary identity was built in fashion, automotive or jewellery, yet whose most loyal consumers have shown they want to inhabit the brand entirely, to sleep inside it, live inside it and have it frame their social world as well as their wardrobe. The logic for DIAFA follows the same line of reasoning. The members of Annabel’s and the regular clientele of Scott’s and Sexy Fish already spend significant portions of their lives within these brands, and a hotel product, a branded residence floor or a members-only arrival experience extends that relationship into the parts of travel and lifestyle that dining alone cannot reach.

The global city opportunity is substantial and the geography is already partially mapped. New York features in the announced plans, with Annabel’s confirmed for opening there. Once proven in that market, the template is highly portable across Los Angeles, Miami, Singapore, Hong Kong, Paris, Milan, Riyadh and Abu Dhabi. Every city with a resident base of high-networth individuals and a consistent flow of international luxury travellers represents a viable node, and the Annabel’s model, a private members club embedded within or adjacent to a premium hotel, with curated social programming and a carefully controlled membership, addresses a gap that currently runs through the luxury travel market with some consistency. At the level of hospitality spend that this clientele represents, the accommodation offer and the social offer have historically been separate purchasing decisions. A globally distributed Annabel’s-anchored hotel product brings them together deliberately. In the US market specifically, where the private members club sector has grown sharply over the past decade and heritage carries considerable cultural cachet, the Birley brand names carry an authority that takes American-built concepts years to accumulate.

Beach clubs follow a similar logic and perhaps an even more immediate regional application. Coastal development in the UAE and Saudi Arabia is advancing at pace, and the beach club format has established itself as one of the highest-margin and most brand-defining components of a luxury resort portfolio. Embedding the Birley Clubs aesthetic within a coastal asset in the Gulf, whether as an integrated component of a larger resort or as a standalone branded destination, gives DIAFA a social programming capability that most hotel developers find extremely difficult to generate organically. Social credibility is a primary driver of venue selection in the Gulf leisure market, and the Annabel’s and Birley names carry genuine weight among the resident expatriate and high-net-worth visitor population that the region draws in volume.

The private members club rollout is where the model becomes genuinely interesting at scale. A Gulf-based iteration of the Birley Clubs concept would be entering a market with real appetite for this kind of social infrastructure. Dubai and Riyadh are producing a generation of senior executives, entrepreneurs and family office principals who are looking for the experience of a curated private community with genuine international connections. The waiting list, the selection process, the physical environment and the programming are all replicable with the right operator, and a Gulf-based Annabel’s would function as a node in a global social network that many of its prospective members already belong to in London.

"The question for these brands in the Gulf is always the same: how do they land, and what do they carry across with them intact."

The Ivy brand had a Dubai presence that ultimately closed, a reminder that brand equity requires careful recalibration for a Gulf audience and that the formula which works in Covent Garden does not transfer automatically. The market has matured considerably since that closure, and the brand’s global profile has grown in the intervening period, which means a revitalised entry, properly resourced and thoughtfully positioned within a platform of this scale, is a substantively different proposition from the original attempt.

The more compelling local reference point for The Ivy’s accessible format is what Joey Gazeal and Natasha Sideris have each built in the UAE. Both have done something genuinely difficult: creating multi-brand hospitality portfolios with distinct identities, consistent execution and the kind of social visibility that makes a venue part of the fabric of how a city chooses to spend its time. They have shaped the accessible luxury and polished casual sectors in this market into what they are today, earning positions in a highly competitive landscape through sustained quality and a deep understanding of the local consumer. Caring’s brands, in the right format and with the right timing, would sit alongside that body of work, and the market is large enough, and the consumer appetite broad enough, to accommodate globally recognised concepts alongside the best of what has been built here. Whether the current geopolitical conditions and the wider market resizing allow that to happen in the near term, or require a longer wait for the right moment, remains to be seen. The appetite, on both sides, is evident.

Caring himself has already demonstrated a considered approach to the regional market. Sexy Fish is established in Dubai, and Scott’s has been consistently cited as the next concept to follow, a sequencing that reflects sound market reading: establish the more contemporary and visually driven concept first, prove the appetite, and then bring the heritage flagship. Current conditions may affect the precise timing of those next moves, but geopolitical headwinds in this region have historically produced pauses rather than permanent changes of direction, and the underlying consumer demand for premium branded dining in the UAE and Saudi Arabia remains strong.

There is a competitive dimension to this deal that the broader coverage has given little attention, and it is one that matters directly to the UAE hospitality landscape: what does it mean for the growth ambitions of operators like Sunset Hospitality Group?

Sunset has built one of the most ambitious and coherent homegrown hospitality platforms in the region, with a portfolio spanning beach clubs, rooftop venues, restaurants and branded experiences across the Gulf and into international markets. Their expansion strategy has been  deliberate and sustained, and the position they have earned in this market reflects genuine operational quality. The DIAFA deal changes the competitive landscape in a specific way: a platform backed by IHC, carrying the Birley Clubs, Caprice Holdings and The Ivy Collection, will increasingly be pursuing the same premium consumer, the same category of real estate opportunity and in time the same international expansion markets.

Homegrown operators with deep local relationships, cultural fluency and an understanding of how to build community in the Gulf market retain real and lasting advantages that a globally branded rollout cannot replicate quickly. And yet the venues competing for the premium leisure spend of Dubai’s resident and visitor population will increasingly include concepts backed by sovereign capital and global brand recognition, which raises the bar on design, programming, service and the social credibility that determines whether a new opening becomes a destination or simply an address. For Sunset, and for every serious regional hospitality operator, the DIAFA deal represents a meaningful shift in the competitive context worth tracking carefully.

This deal sits within a movement that has been building steadily across the GCC for several years.

Gulf sovereign wealth funds collectively manage more than five trillion dollars in assets, representing close to 40 percent of global sovereign wealth fund AUM, and the deployment of that capital into luxury experiential assets has become an increasingly deliberate allocation rather than an opportunistic one. Qatar’s Katara Hospitality holds a 50 percent stake in The Savoy in London, The Plaza in New York and more than 40 luxury hotels worldwide. Abu Dhabi’s ADQ and ADNEC Group jointly acquired a 40.5 percent stake in Egypt’s Icon hospitality arm, which includes Four Seasons and Kempinski properties. Dubai Holding has extended its European hotel footprint through the acquisition of Jumeirah Mallorca. The pattern across these transactions is consistent: established brands with strong identity and defensible market positions, acquired with patient capital and assembled into platforms with global reach.

What distinguishes the DIAFA model is the operating ambition behind it. Gulf capital has demonstrated over many years that it can acquire iconic global assets. The Caring acquisition, and the platform logic it sits within, is an expression of something further along that journey: the ambition to operate, grow and distribute those assets with the discipline and brand intelligence that builds enduring value across generations. That is a different kind of institutional confidence, and the appointment of Thakran, with his specific background in scaling luxury brands globally, is the clearest indicator of where the platform intends to position itself.

For the global hospitality industry, the consolidation of luxury F&B into platform structures of this scale carries real implications. Independent iconic venues operated without the infrastructure of scale will find the competitive environment progressively more demanding as platform operators with global marketing reach, cross-brand loyalty mechanics and institutional capital consolidate their positions. The Ivy has long had the instinct to grow.

Annabel’s has always had the cultural weight to travel beyond its founding address. The question of how these brands perform in New York, or the Gulf is now a matter of operational planning rather than strategic speculation.

For British business professionals working in or adjacent to the GCC hospitality sector, this deal has a direct bearing on the conversation about leadership and career trajectory.

Platforms of this scale and ambition require operational leaders with a genuinely rare combination of skills: the ability to manage brand integrity across multiple cultural contexts, build and retain high-performance teams in environments that vary considerably, and sustain the service culture that made these venues worth acquiring in the first place. The flow of talent between London, Dubai and New York in the luxury hospitality sector is already accelerating, driven by exactly this kind of demand, and the executives who carry fluency in both the British social context that gives venues like Annabel’s their meaning, and the Gulf market dynamics that will shape their next chapter, are among the most sought-after professionals in the sector.

A FINAL OBSERVATION:

Deals at this scale tend to generate questions about whether the character of the venues involved will survive the transition to new ownership, and whether the combination of institutional capital and growth ambition is compatible with the kind of atmosphere that makes these places worth caring about. Those questions are legitimate and the hospitality industry has seen enough cautionary examples to take them seriously.

Caring’s decision to remain as Executive Chairman, and to continue shaping the culture of these venues alongside DIAFA, is the most meaningful answer available at this stage. A man who spent decades building a business on the precise calibration of atmosphere, discretion and social credibility chose this partnership and structured his continuing involvement within it. That tells you something about the terms that were negotiated and the protections that were secured.

On the question of price, there will be voices in the market who argue that £1.4 billion represents a significant premium for a collection of restaurants and private members clubs, and that DIAFA has overpaid. That analysis misreads the nature of what has been acquired.

These are among the most respected institutional brands in the world, built across generations and, by their very nature, impossible to replicate. The Ivy, Annabel’s, Scott’s, Harry’s Bar: these are addresses that cannot be constructed from capital alone, no matter how patient or how deep. To acquire the brands, the physical assets, the membership base and the founder still in his seat is not an act of extravagance. It is a recognition that assets of this rarity trade at a premium precisely because they come available so infrequently, if at all.

"The bolder question is whether this deal marks the beginning of one of the world’s most valuable luxury lifestyle platforms, built not in Paris or London, but in Abu Dhabi."

Consider the parallel. LVMH, the world’s most valuable luxury group, was constructed through decades of disciplined acquisition, each brand acquired for its heritage, its irreplaceability and its capacity to anchor a global consumer relationship. Kering did the same. Richemont did the same. Each of those groups now commands market valuations that dwarf the sum of their individual acquisition prices many times over, because the platform premium, the distribution, the cross-brand loyalty and the institutional credibility of the group itself, adds value that no single brand could generate independently. DIAFA, with Zuma and Roka through Azumi, the h.wood Group, and now the entirety of Caring’s portfolio, is assembling the experiential hospitality equivalent of that architecture. If the operating discipline matches the acquisition logic, and the appointment of Thakran suggests it might, the £1.4 billion paid for the Caring portfolio may in time look considerably more measured than it does today. All of it originating from Abu Dhabi, the UAE’s capital, and the emerging centre of gravity for a new generation of global luxury.

The DIAFA deal is the most significant signal yet that the centre of gravity in global luxury hospitality has shifted. London and New York remain the cultural anchors they have always been. They now sit within a platform whose capital, ambition and strategic mandate originate in the Gulf, and whose next decade of development will be shaped by decisions made in Abu Dhabi as much as in Mayfair. For those of us working in the UAE, that is a development worth watching closely and contributing to wherever the opportunity exists.

Author: David Singleton is the founder of Oraculi, a Dubai-based executive coaching and strategic advisory practice, a former Board member and current member of the British Chamber of Commerce Dubai. He has worked across the hospitality and consumer brands sector globally.